This document discusses some common problems that people run into when using Ray as well as some known problems. If you encounter other problems, please let us know.
You just ran an application using Ray, but it wasn’t as fast as you expected it to be. Or worse, perhaps it was slower than the serial version of the application! The most common reasons are the following.
- Number of cores: How many cores is Ray using? When you start Ray, it will
determine the number of CPUs on each machine with
psutil.cpu_count(). Ray usually will not schedule more tasks in parallel than the number of CPUs. So if the number of CPUs is 4, the most you should expect is a 4x speedup.
- Physical versus logical CPUs: Do the machines you’re running on have fewer
physical cores than logical cores? You can check the number of logical
psutil.cpu_count()and the number of physical cores with
psutil.cpu_count(logical=False). This is common on a lot of machines and especially on EC2. For many workloads (especially numerical workloads), you often cannot expect a greater speedup than the number of physical CPUs.
- Small tasks: Are your tasks very small? Ray introduces some overhead for each task (the amount of overhead depends on the arguments that are passed in). You will be unlikely to see speedups if your tasks take less than ten milliseconds. For many workloads, you can easily increase the sizes of your tasks by batching them together.
- Variable durations: Do your tasks have variable duration? If you run 10
tasks with variable duration in parallel, you shouldn’t expect an N-fold
speedup (because you’ll end up waiting for the slowest task). In this case,
ray.waitto begin processing tasks that finish first.
- Multi-threaded libraries: Are all of your tasks attempting to use all of
the cores on the machine? If so, they are likely to experience contention and
prevent your application from achieving a speedup. You can diagnose this by
topwhile your application is running. If one process is using most of the CPUs, and the others are using a small amount, this may be the problem. This is very common with some versions of
numpy, and in that case can usually be setting an environment variable like
MKL_NUM_THREADS(or the equivalent depending on your installation) to
If you are still experiencing a slowdown, but none of the above problems apply, we’d really like to know! Please create a GitHub issue and consider submitting a minimal code example that demonstrates the problem.
If Ray crashed, you may wonder what happened. Currently, this can occur for some of the following reasons.
Stressful workloads: Workloads that create many many tasks in a short amount of time can sometimes interfere with the heartbeat mechanism that we use to check that processes are still alive. On the head node in the cluster, you can check the files
/tmp/raylogs/monitor-******.err. They will indicate which processes Ray has marked as dead (due to a lack of heartbeats). However, it is currently possible for a process to get marked as dead without actually having died.
Starting many actors: Workloads that start a large number of actors all at once may exhibit problems when the processes (or libraries that they use) contend for resources. Similarly, a script that starts many actors over the lifetime of the application will eventually cause the system to run out of file descriptors. This is addressable, but currently we do not garbage collect actor processes until the script finishes.
Running out of file descriptors: As a workaround, you may be able to increase the maximum number of file descriptors with a command like
ulimit -n 65536. If that fails, double check that the hard limit is sufficiently large by running
ulimit -Hn. If it is too small, you can increase the hard limit as follows (these instructions work on EC2).
Increase the hard ulimit for open file descriptors system-wide by running the following.
sudo bash -c "echo $USER hard nofile 65536 >> /etc/security/limits.conf"
Logout and log back in.
If a workload is hanging and not progressing, the problem may be one of the following.
- Reconstructing an object created with put: When an object that is needed
has been evicted or lost, Ray will attempt to rerun the task that created the
object. However, there are some cases that currently are not handled. For
example, if the object was created by a call to
ray.puton the driver process, then the argument that was passed into
ray.putis no longer available and so the call to
ray.putcannot be rerun (without rerunning the driver).
- Reconstructing an object created by actor task: Ray currently does not reconstruct objects created by actor methods.
Ray’s serialization is currently imperfect. If you encounter an object that Ray does not serialize/deserialize correctly, please let us know. For example, you may want to bring it up on this thread.
Outdated Function Definitions¶
Due to subtleties of Python, if you redefine a remote function, you may not always get the expected behavior. In this case, it may be that Ray is not running the newest version of the function.
Suppose you define a remote function
f and then redefine it. Ray should use
the newest version.
@ray.remote def f(): return 1 @ray.remote def f(): return 2 ray.get(f.remote()) # This should be 2.
However, the following are cases where modifying the remote function will not update Ray to the new version (at least without stopping and restarting Ray).
The function is imported from an external file: In this case,
fis defined in some external file
file.py. If you
import file, change the definition of
file.py, then re-
import file, the function
fwill not be updated.
This is because the second import gets ignored as a no-op, so
fis still defined by the first import.
A solution to this problem is to use
reload(file)instead of a second
import file. Reloading causes the new definition of
fto be re-executed, and exports it to the other machines. Note that in Python 3, you need to do
from importlib import reload.
The function relies on a helper function from an external file: In this case,
fcan be defined within your Ray application, but relies on a helper function
hdefined in some external file
file.py. If the definition of
hgets changed in
fwill not update Ray to use the new version of
This is because when
ffirst gets defined, its definition is shipped to all of the workers, and is unpickled. During unpickling,
file.pygets imported in the workers. Then when
fgets redefined, its definition is again shipped and unpickled in all of the workers. But since
file.pyhas been imported in the workers already, it is treated as a second import and is ignored as a no-op.
Unfortunately, reloading on the driver does not update
h, as the reload needs to happen on the worker.
A solution to this problem is to redefine
file.pybefore it calls
h. For example, if inside
def h(): return 1
And you define remote function
@ray.remote def f(): return file.h()
You can redefine
@ray.remote def f(): reload(file) return file.h()
This forces the reload to happen on the workers as needed. Note that in Python 3, you need to do
from importlib import reload.